Sampling session state
Oracle wait event interface took years to become widely known for their power in performance tuning and to be adopted by other database vendors. With this article you’ll be able to beat the curve harnessing the power the new concept of Active Session History (ASH). ASH represents a revolution in performance tuning data as radical as the introduction of wait events and Embarcadero gives access to this data right now across the major database platforms Oracle, DB2, Sybase and SQL Server. Wait events revolutionized tuning way back in Oracle 7 by identifying performance bottlenecks in the database and explicitly quantifying their impact. The wait interface has been adopted by SQL Server, Sybase and most recently DB2. Still lacking in the wait events interface was the ability to identify the causes of the problems. The solution has come with ASH. ASH clearly identifies the SQL and Sessions at the root of wait bottlenecks.
ASH ironically has be technically feasible by a savvy DBA since Oracle 7 but it took Oracle 10g for anyone to put this cutting edge technology to work, and in no small way, but by actually implanting it in the Oracle kernel and basing Oracle 10g performance tools on ASH. ASH is founded upon a data gathering technique called “Sampling.” Sampling is a method of collecting data by taking snapshots every second. The snapshots record the state of every active session in the database. For every active session, Oracle records the SQL being executed as well as the state of the session. A session state can be running on the CPU or waiting on any of several hundred wait events. With this simple amount of information, the session + state + sql , we can quickly identify SQL that are CPU intensive, IO intensive or involved in any number of the possible resource contention issues that can arise in an Oracle database.
Looking at the situation more concretely, when there is a slow down on the database we look at our trusted Statspack report for the period of the slowdown. The first step in analyzing the statspack report is to look at the Top 5 Timed Events
The top 5 timed wait events will tell us if any wait event has crept up to cause a bottleneck. If we do find a wait event bottleneck we will want to know who or what is causing the problem in order to solve it. For example if there is a CPU bottleneck, we want to know what SQL statement is hogging the CPU. If there is an IO bottleneck we want to know what SQL statement is stuck on IO and needs tuning. If there is a complex situation like a buffer busy waits or latch contention we want to know which sessions were involved, what the wait event arguments were and what SQL they were executing. Statspack fails to give us the necessary detailed information but ASH does.
Real Life Example
Let’s look at a real life example on an Oracle 9i database. This example is one of the harder wait bottleneck to solve, so if you can follow this one then it’s downhill from here. This example is one of the more complex tuning problems and thus the analysis requires a deep understanding of Oracle wait events.
Imagine a situation where users call into the help desk complaining that the application has slowed down. The help desk determines it’s not the application and calls me, the DBA, to fix it. To solve the situation I run the statspack reports over the last hour and look at "Top 5 Timed Events"
|Event||Waits||Time (s)||Call Time|
|buffer busy waits||2,748||250||78.72|
|free buffer waits||1,588||15||4.63|
|write complete waits||10||8||2.51|
|log buffer space||306||5||1.51|
Sure enough there is a bottleneck and the bottleneck is on “buffer busy waits”, but now what do I do to solve it? There are some guesses I can make, and I can even use some data in statspack to help guess, but there is no way to conclusively analyze this wait bottleneck or most wait events with statspack. To solve most wait event bottlenecks we want more detailed information than is available in statspack. What information do we need? We mainly want to know what SQL, Sessions, Objects and wait details are involved. How do we get that information? We get that information by sampling v$session_wait, i.e. via ASH. We also have to understand how to solve each wait event and specifically in this case how to solve “buffer busy waits.” A complete explanation of buffer busy waits is beyond here but a little information on them will suffice. A buffer busy wait has two central causes in Oracle 9i. The first cause is contention on reads off disk and is equivalent to an IO wait. The second cause is sessions bottlenecking on writing to a particular block. In order to solve the problem I have to know first the kind of buffer busy wait bottleneck, read or write, and second I need to know the objects and queries involved. With this information I can take steps to alleviate the problem.
How do we find the objects and SQL involved in the buffer busy waits? The information we want can be found in a table v$session_wait when the problem exists but v$session_wait only represents the current state of the system and if our problem is intermittent or in the past then the information we want from v$session_wait will be lost. V$session_wait’s lack of history is where the new Oracle 10g concept Active Session History (ASH) comes in. ASH at its simplest is just reading v$session_wait (actually v$session which includes v$session_wait starting in 10g) every second and storing the data. Oracle does this automatically in 10g but it has been possible in every version since Oracle 7 by running the following query:
column sid format 999
column username format a10
column serial format 99999
column hash_value format 9999999999
column event format a15
column p1 format 9999999999
column p2 format 99999999
column p3 format 9999
- nvl(s.username,s.program) username,
- s.sid sid,
- s.serial# serial,
- s.sql_hash_value hash_value,
- 0, w.event,
- 'ON CPU'),1,15) event ,
- w.p1 p1,
- w.p2 p2,
- w.p3 p3
from v$session s,
- v$session_wait w
From the above query we get output like this.
|SYS||64||8717||4116021597||PL/SQL lock timer||300||0||0|
|STARGUS||71||6251||1311875676||direct path write||201||2155902||127|
|(CJQ0)||9||1||0||rdbms ipc message||500||0||0|
In the case of the buffer busy wait, I’ve been running the above query and storing it in a table that I created myself and called v$ash. I can now read v$ash and look for the detail information I need to solve the buffer busy wait problem. First I want to know what kind of buffer busy waits were happening either read or write. Read or write can be determined from the P3 column which tells us whether the buffer busy wait was a read or write bottleneck. (The P1, P2 and P3 columns have a different meaning for each wait event.) If P3 is 200 or greater the problem is write contention, if P2 is less than 200 it is a simple IO wait.
SQL> Select count(*), p3 from v$ash where event = 'buffer busy waits' group by p3;
COUNT(*) P3 ---------- ---- 3423 220
We see that all the P3 values are 220 thus this is a write problem (below 200 is read contention, above 200 is write contention). Write problems can happen for all sorts of reasons depending on the block type the writing is occurring on, so in order to solve this issue we have to know what kind of block the problem is occurring on. We can find this out by looking at p1 and p2 for the buffer busy waits which represents the file and the block:
select count(*), p1 filen, p2 blockn , hash_value
where event='buffer busy waits'
group by p1, p2, hash_value;
I’ll just pick the last block and find out what object it is coming from:
column segment_name format a30 select owner, segment_name, segment_type, block_id, blocks+block_id from dba_extents where file_id = 1 and 126334 between block_id AND block_id + blocks-1;
From this result I know it’s a data block of a table and not a header block (because the header block would be the first block in the object). Now the question is what are the sessions doing? I can look at the sql and see what they are executing:
SQL> select count(*), p1 filen, p2 blockn , hash_value 2 from v$ash 3 where event='buffer busy waits' 4 group by p1, p2, hash_value;
I can see that the same SQL is causing all the “buffer busy waits” because the hash value is the same. Now I can find out what that sql statement is by:
INSERT into toto1 values (:b1,lpad('a',1000,'a'))
With this final piece of information I can determine that the segment is missing free lists or not in an ASSM tablespace. Let’s check these possibilities.
select FREELISTS, TABLESPACE_NAME
where table_name='TOTO1' and owner='SCOTT';
Automatic Segment Space Management:
select tablespace_name, SEGMENT_SPACE_MANAGEMENT
We see that that the table is in a table space, USERS, that does not have ASSM active.
In summary, the table TOTO1 has wait contention on writes to blocks and multiple sessions are concurrently inserting into it and it has no free lists nor is it in an Automatic Segment Space Managed (ASSM) table space. This causes all sessions inserting to insert into the same block, the last free one on the one free list and thus fight over exclusive write access to that last block. The solutions is to either put the segment into a ASSM table space and let Oracle handle the contention or put free lists on the segment which is more precise. If I choose free lists, then how many do I need? I need as many as there are concurrent users inserting into the table which I can get with
select count(*), sid, serial from v$ash where event='buffer busy waits'
group by sid, serial;
There were 4 sessions inserting during the period of ASH data I looked at, thus in my case I need 4 free lists.
Extended Power of ASH
The above example is simplified. Two other important pieces of data missing in the above example that also need to be tracked are sql_text and sample_time. Sample_time is required to group data by performance bottleneck time periods and sql_text should be collected on an ongoing basis in case the SQL found in v$session_wait gets kicked out of the shared pool. At the end of the day collecting ASH becomes quite complicated with the need to partition and purge data, send data to a different repository to reduce overhead on the target and the need to collect other bits of information like maps of user# to username and object# to object name. To see a package that does much of this, refer to http://ashmasters.com.
Even with a good collection running, it takes some nontrivial sql to mine the richness of the data.
Even with a good set of scripts to analyze the data it takes a number of well written sql statements to drill down sufficiently into the problem.
Luckily DB Optimizer supplies all of this functionality across all versions of Oracle 7-11 as well as Sybase, DB2 and SQL Server. The technology is the same. The data collected seems simple. The power is in the aggregation of the data and the user interface to the data. DB Optimizer automatically collects all of the data, analyzes all the wait events, reports on bottlenecks, and supplies solutions.
On top of this, the data is displayed in a graphically in DB Optimizer in a way that condenses the equivalent dozens of sql statements that would take time and effort to run and comprehend into visual that can be immediately understood.
Even in this reduced graphic we can quickly and easily see that there is a performance problem on the machine. In this case there is clearly a CPU bottleneck, because the DB Optimizer reports that CPU (in the top chart, the green) is above the maximum CPU on the machine (the dotted red line). This means that the machine is at 100% CPU and there are processes in the run queue. We can also see the chart at the bottom left that one SQL statement is using much more CPU than any other sql statement, so this is the statement to tune. It only takes a second to scan the graphic and see where the problem is and it’s all based on ASH.
ASH is a leap in performance tuning technology. It took a clear vision of the future and a bit of a leap of faith to let go of the compulsive need to have exact measurements and instead embrace sampling a technology that statistically approximates the same value with little loss of accuracy but at the same time brings a great wealth of information necessary for analyzing the performance of a database. ASH can be simulated DB2, SQL Server, Sybase and on any version of Oracle since v7 with the simple act of repeatedly sampling and storing the values from a structure equivalent to Oracle's v$session_wait into a historic table. Although the idea is easy, the implementation turns out to be fairly complex. Luckily DB Optimizer implements not only ASH in version 10g but across Oracle versions 7,8,9,10,11 and the other major database platforms SQL Server, DB2 and Sybase . The best part of all is that DB Optimizer exposes all the data and analysis in powerful graphics that cut through the complexity of the data and provide a simple user interface that communicates quickly and clearly the date of the system.